Kodak is your father’s Oldsmobile

Facebook Jail
Free your Images from Facebook?

Kodak has organized a stunt whereby a man will remain trapped in a box until 1 million photos are set free from Facebook by using the new My Kodak Moments app.  With the app, users can pull photos directly from their albums and their friends’ albums to create photobooks and prints, which can then be ordered on Facebook for delivery.

If you’re in New York City, you can visit Mark Malkoff in his transparent box. Or regardless of where you are, you could print something and help end his imprisonment.  Or you could cry, or maybe just cringe.

Yes, I get that this is marketing schtick.  It doesn’t have to make complete sense.  But does it have to be embarrassing? After all, they’re nice prints. The photo books are great. The app is well done. It’s the message behind the stunt that makes me wince. (Full disclosure: I work for Kodak.)

Think about it. Kodak thinks your photos are trapped in Facebook Jail.  A place where they are easily sharable with 800 million Facebook users.  A place where they are archived indefinitely.  A place where they are downloadable, linkable, or cross-postable on demand. Yup, these photos are confined like a lion on the Serengeti.

Further, Kodak is proposing to “free” your photos by printing them such that they exist on a single piece of paper and are only sharable with people who can see over your shoulder.  This is like trying to convince people to free their music from iTunes by pressing it onto vinyl disks.

They should just hang up a sign that says, “Kodak—We don’t get it… and get off our lawn.”

Let’s face it, Kodak is in trouble.  This is no secret.  The news reports daily on Eastman Kodak’s efforts to remain financially solvent as it tries to shed the shame of failing to capitalize on the market’s shift to digital imaging (a technology it pioneered) and reinvent itself as a printing company, all in the midst of the worst economic downturn since the Great Depression.  Not an easy go.

But it’s one thing to be late to the game.  It’s another to show up at the football field with your first baseman’s mitt and your swim goggles and wonder why no one picks you for their team.

No Good Deed Goes Unpunished

Just MarriedLast night, New York State made history on a couple of counts.  Most prominently, it became the sixth and largest state to legalize same-sex marriage.

Secondarily, the passage of the bill happened because four Republicans crossed the aisle and signed on to the legislation in the State Senate.  These people should be lauded as they will doubtless face repercussions for stepping out of party ranks.  They did what they believed was right, without regard to their political futures.

However, while these two accomplishments are overdue and encouraging, the late night Albany session also produced approvals of several other policies which are going largely unnoticed in all the hoopla.

Buried on page two of this story is a brief mention that also approved was a tuition hike for SUNY Schools that will result in a 30% increase over the next five years.  For parents of teen children, this is not small potatoes.  This means a year’s expenses that currently cost $19k would rise to almost $25k by 2016.

Also approved was Governor Cuomo’s property tax cap.  The cap limits property tax growth to 2% or the rate of inflation in any year.  There’s no doubt that New York’s property taxes are ridiculously expensive, but as I’ve written about before, the tax cap is an ugly solution.  It virtually guarantees preemptive maximum tax increases every year because local governments and schools can’t take the risk of keeping taxes low and then not being able to cover expenses in future years.

So while marriage equality and non-partisan action are things to feel good about, plan to have your wallet drained for college tuition and property taxes.

Cuomo’s property tax cap is an ugly solution

Andrew Cuomo
Cuomo advocates for a property tax cap in NY (Photo by Michael Nagle-Getty Images)

New York Gov. Andrew Cuomo has made a 2% property-tax cap a centerpiece of his new administration.  The state’s local taxes are now 79 percent above the national average, making them the highest among the 50 states.  Residents and businesses alike agree something has to be done.  However, there remains great debate on whether or not a tax cap is the best solution.

At first blush, the cap would seem to address the most direct cause of the financial pain.  Taxes are high and continue to rise in excess of the rate of inflation.  Stop that.  But considered from the municipality’s point of view, this constrains revenue, but not spending.

There should be a relationship between revenue and spending, but for counties, towns, and school districts in New York many programs are mandated by the state or the federal government. Mandates include special education, which at more than $24,000 per student is far more expensive in New York than in most other states.  And lawmakers have added 257 additional requirements to federal disabilities laws, according to the Citizens Budget Commission.  Further, school and municipal retirement and health insurance programs are set up by the state, but paid for locally.

This means that much of the spending is not under the control of the governments whose revenue has just been capped.  Local communities cannot run in deficit, meaning that non-mandated spending must be cut or the state must start providing funding for the mandates it has issued.  If the state doesn’t step up, expect layoffs of teachers, firemen, and police.  Road and sidewalk maintenance will be curtailed.  Playgrounds, community centers, and other popular local services and facilities will suffer.

The bet is that the dysfunctional NY state legislature won’t allow the local communities to suffer and will approve state spending to cover mandates.  But this is the same legislature who must pass the property tax cap.  In essence, they would be approving a tax cap in an effort to force themselves to approve paying for mandates.  Wouldn’t a sane body just deal with the mandates rather than trying to hold itself hostage?

Complicating this matter is Cuomo’s proposal that a 60% majority of local voters could pass a resolution to exceed the cap.  The likely result being that relatively affluent communities would opt to maintain the schools and community programs in their area, while less economically able areas would have to suffer the loss of services.  So the legislative bet is really that Albany will step in to prevent the economic suffering in the poorer regions of the state.  Given Albany’s history, there will be long odds on that wager.

It may well be that the property tax cap is the only program Cuomo can get passed.  The legislature has ignored the mandate problem for decades, and there’s no reason to believe they will act without some sort of leverage.  This may be the best tool available.  But citizens should be aware that while it sounds like a tax cap is in their best interests, the real objective is to create local pain such that Albany can be spurred to action.  If they act, they will be rescuing you from themselves—a result they are completely capable of doing without making you suffer in the first place.