{"id":1580,"date":"2010-03-07T07:44:01","date_gmt":"2010-03-07T12:44:01","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/nicholsclan.com\/tinblog\/?p=1580"},"modified":"2010-03-06T13:23:52","modified_gmt":"2010-03-06T18:23:52","slug":"obama-hates-the-troops","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/timscogitorium.com\/tinblog\/2010\/03\/obama-hates-the-troops.html","title":{"rendered":"Obama Hates the Troops"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>Or so you&#8217;d think to read the latest screed making its way across Facebook.\u00a0 Kim sent this in and asked for a fact-check.\u00a0 And as it&#8217;s not often I get blog  requests, I got right on it.\u00a0 The viral status update reads:<\/p>\n<blockquote><p><em>President Obama has proposed a 1.4% pay increase for active duty military in 2011. This is THE LOWEST SINCE 1973! Nice to know that during a time of rampant inflation, while war is fought in 2 theatres, our men and women in uniform get A LOWER PAY INCREASE THAN WELFARE RECIPIENTS!!! Please repost if you support our troops.<\/em><\/p><\/blockquote>\n<p>Let&#8217;s start with the easy stuff. Obama did propose a 1.4% increase.\u00a0 It is also the lowest increase proposal since 1973.\u00a0 Those points are true.\u00a0 Now hold on tight because the accuracy drops off steeply right after that.<\/p>\n<p>&#8220;Rampant inflation&#8221;?\u00a0 <a href=\"http:\/\/www.inflationdata.com\/inflation\/Inflation_Rate\/CurrentInflation.asp\">Average inflation for all of 2009<\/a> was -0.34%.\u00a0 Note, that is a negative sign!\u00a0 It was less than zero.\u00a0 Technically that&#8217;s deflation, which is an economic concern in its own right, but still means that your dollar buys more now than it did a year ago.\u00a0 There is debate about whether inflation will pick up again in 2010, but the debate is over whether it will be tiny or negative.\u00a0 Nobody (except perhaps the author) is worried about it being rampant.<\/p>\n<p>On another point, it&#8217;s impossible to compare military pay to welfare.\u00a0 Military pay is set at the federal level where the states individually set their own Welfare payment schedules.\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 The most analogous comparison might be to Social Security benefits.\u00a0 They are set federally, and are similarly subject to annual revision.\u00a0 However, <a href=\"http:\/\/www.dailyfinance.com\/story\/no-social-security-cola-in-2010\/1540465\/\">there was no cost of living increase for Social Security in 2010<\/a>.\u00a0 ZERO.\u00a0 Note that there has been a SS COLA increase in every year since 1975 except 2010.\u00a0 The rationale is essentially the same.\u00a0 The Consumer Price Index and inflation were basically flat, so no increase is needed to maintain the same standard of living.\u00a0 The military is doing better than our seniors.\u00a0 Further, the 1.4% proposal is actually pretty reasonable.\u00a0 Most corporate  payrolls won&#8217;t go up by that much in 2010.\u00a0 Just look at your own paycheck.\u00a0 How big of a base pay raise did you get this year?<\/p>\n<p>But let&#8217;s not declare victory just yet.\u00a0 If we go back to the <a href=\"http:\/\/www.military.com\/news\/article\/white-house-offers-14-pay-raise-in-2011.html\">original announcement<\/a> of this proposal and read past the first paragraph, there is another interesting tidbit.\u00a0 &#8220;Housing allowance increases, new retention bonuses and specialty pays  will drive troops\u2019 actual compensation up about 4.2 percent next year.&#8221;<\/p>\n<p>However, the dumbest implication of the post is that somehow this is a  plot by Obama to malign the troops.\u00a0 In actuality, Obama recommended the largest possible increase allowed under current law.\u00a0 The law specifies that the President may not make a recommendation for a military pay increase that is larger than the Employment Cost Index, which just happens to be at&#8230; 1.4%.\u00a0 Congress can opt to enact a larger number, but the President has no control over that.<\/p>\n<p>Unfortunately, I suspect most of the people inclined to update their Facebook status with such blather aren&#8217;t going to be troubled with a few contradictory facts.\u00a0 But for those interested in the truth, I&#8217;m happy to help.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Or so you&#8217;d think to read the latest screed making its way across Facebook.\u00a0 Kim sent this in and asked<\/p>\n<p class=\"readmore\"><a href=\"https:\/\/timscogitorium.com\/tinblog\/2010\/03\/obama-hates-the-troops.html\" title=\"Read Obama Hates the Troops\">Read more &raquo;<\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[3],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-1580","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-politics"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/timscogitorium.com\/tinblog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1580","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/timscogitorium.com\/tinblog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/timscogitorium.com\/tinblog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/timscogitorium.com\/tinblog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/timscogitorium.com\/tinblog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=1580"}],"version-history":[{"count":3,"href":"https:\/\/timscogitorium.com\/tinblog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1580\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":1583,"href":"https:\/\/timscogitorium.com\/tinblog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1580\/revisions\/1583"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/timscogitorium.com\/tinblog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=1580"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/timscogitorium.com\/tinblog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=1580"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/timscogitorium.com\/tinblog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=1580"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}