Archive for February, 2010

Why Texas Matters

February 28th, 2010

I’ve railed before against the misguided Texas State Board of Education and its agenda driven rewrite of the state’s science curricula.  And my concern is not only with the students of Texas, but for us all.  Because of the size of the Texas market for school books, publishers will produce and release books adhering to the Texas curricula for the nation as a whole.  That’s why Texas matters.

Not content with just messing with science class, the Texas Board is now futzing with Social Studies.  Students are required to learn about key organizations and individuals of the conservative resurgence of the 1980s and 90s.  These include the Moral Majority and the NRA.  However, requirements to cover Edward Kennedy, Sonya Sotomayor, Thurgood Marshall, and Hillary Clinton were voted down.  Students will also learn there was a factual basis for Sen. Joseph McCarthy’s contention the U.S. government was infiltrated with Communists in the 1950s.  On the plus side, efforts to remove Hip Hop music and the Scopes Monkey Trial failed.  Still, the bottom line is, even if you’re not a science junkie you should be worried about what’s going on down there.

Alley OopIn a possibly related story, a recent poll of Texans showed that 41% of them believe that humans and dinosaurs did not live at the same time.  The remainder were apparently overly influenced by Alley Oop, The Flintstones, the Raquel Welch epic One Million Years BC, or other multimedia documentaries of their youth.

I suppose this means we shouldn’t really be expecting too much from Texas.  Maybe it’s okay that they don’t know so much about science or history.  After all, there’s a lot of brush down there to clear.  And I’m sure Houston can import the necessary rocket scientists from other states.  We just need to figure out how to make sure they don’t drag the rest of us down with them.

Hockey Queens

February 27th, 2010

Classy CanadaI have great respect for women hockey players. Let’s face it, I’m not brave enough not to.  This picture may explain why.  And it brings back a few memories.

I went to school in the great frozen north where hockey wasn’t just a sport, it was a religion.  And it was also the first time I realized that there was even such a thing as women hockey players.  There were a few of them living in my dorm.  And while they were great girls, they were also the toughest women I’ve ever met.  They are better men than your dad will ever be.  So the notion that Women’s Team Canada might celebrate with a cigar and a can of beer is not remotely a stretch.

Congratulations ladies!

Aural Lensing

February 26th, 2010

Not surprisingly, we all hear through our own lens that shapes the conversation.  Our brains try desperately to hear the things we most want to hear as well as the things we are most afraid to hear.   While this is sometimes amusing when applied to the differences in the sexes (especially if it’s about somebody else’s relationship), it’s not remotely a gender based phenomenon.
Said vs. HeardLately, we see this potently in politics where the far left, the far right, and whatever the Tea Partiers are make mountains of the opposition’s molehills.  Often the actual message is lost in the sea of sound bites and inflammatory opinion.

Perhaps Deborah Tannen’s advice for men and women might be applicable in our national discourse as well.  Her essential thesis was that we don’t lack the skills to express ourselves, we lack the skills to listen.  We need to hone our ability to hear the message the speaker intended rather than the message our lens was amplifying.  Much like in personal relationships, we may find that we have more common ground and shared goals than we think.

Don’t Ask Don’t Tell?

February 25th, 2010

Kim has always been fond of pointing out the cognitive dissonance required to be Pro-Life and Pro-Death Penalty.  Here’s another conundrum she can add to her arsenal of irony.

Fetus Button

Dogs of Hell

February 24th, 2010

Hot DogThis is America dammit.  A place where we tackle the big issues and let the small stuff take care of itself.  That’s why in an effort to save the children we are not focusing on trivial stuff like poverty, healthcare, and schools.  Nope, we’re going after the real threat to future generations… hot dogs.

Yes, the venerable all American wiener is at the heart of the country’s greatest threat to kids: obesity nutrition ketchup allergies choking.  Wait… what?

That’s right, mom’s throughout the nation are unwittingly stuffing pork filled corks down their children’s throats, and the Academy of American Pediatrics thinks it’s high time the carnage stops.  Minimally they are calling for warning labels on hot dogs.  But ideally, it would be safer for all if the shape changed.  Dr. Gary Smith, immediate-past chairman of the AAP, was quoted as saying:

“Any food that has a cylindrical or round shape poses a risk, but hot dogs were high on the list of foods that could be redesigned — perhaps the shape, although it would be up to the manufacturers to figure out the specifics.”

I’m thinking a nice square edged bar-shaped dog would be perfect.  Not only would the sharp angles prevent the complete sealing of the unfortunately cylindrically shaped throat.  But square dogs would provide more surface area for condiments and a natural space between the dog and the bun to stuff them so dogs with the works wouldn’t be so top-loaded.  Further, the square edges would grip the buns and prevent that annoying tendency of the dog to squeeze out the top of the roll.  And they wouldn’t roll off the grill or the plate anymore!  They could be stacked like lumber rather than cord wood.  The advantages are apparently endless.

So waste no time.  Write your Congressman to support legislation requiring the redesign of the hot dog.  If Congress won’t listen, then let’s get Glenn Beck behind it.  Nobody can play up a threat to America like he can.  For mercy’s sake, at least join a Facebook group supporting the cause.

After all, it’s for the children.

Total Recall

February 23rd, 2010

Phillip K. Dick’s novelette, “We Can Remember It for You Wholesale” (which was very loosely re-imagined as the movie Total Recall starring Arnold “The Governator” Schwarzenegger) imagined a world in which the budget constrained went on exotic vacations by having the memories just implanted into their minds. During the 60′s, this was known as “taking a trip without ever leaving the farm,” although the process involved chemistry rather than electronics.

Tropical BeachThe point being that the rejuvenating after-effects of the vacation could be achieved without ever actually going on the trip, as long as you remembered it. However, a team of Dutch researchers have discovered that the benefits of a vacation are largely enjoyed before you ever leave.  People are more relaxed and content than their non-vacationing peers during the build-up to a trip.  But once home again, their Reason To Live Index once again drops into line with their colleagues.

The study concluded that, “…to maximize the restorative powers of vacation, people should take multiple short breaks over the course of the work year, instead of saving everything for one long trip.”  And that when it comes to planning a trip, the top priority should be low stress.

Being on the verge of a long planned and well deserved vacation myself, I can certainly agree that the anticipation is compelling and restorative in it’s own right. Kim is in her element under the sun and frolicking in or near (shallow) water, and as her extra-pale Irish man I’m packing enough sunscreen to make my skin think it’s nighttime.  We are ready, and maybe a little anxious.

Further, we opted for a packaged deal to keep the planning stress low.  So all that seems on track.   I suppose for all I know we’ll be strapped into memory implantation chairs rather than airline seats upon departure.  But regardless of how the memories are achieved, I intend to have them, cherish them, and not let the return to the work-a-day world melt all those good feelings away prematurely.  Yet I’m sure everyone plans for that.

Either way, at least we still have a few weeks of contented yearning to enjoy.

It’s Who You Know

February 22nd, 2010

CBS has a new show on Sunday evenings called Undercover Boss.  The premise is kind of interesting.  A company CEO  goes into his own company as an entry level employee and learns something about what really goes on in their organizations.  I’m sure many of us who work  in corporate America wish their CEO had a similar taste.

Not surprisingly, often the undercover executive meets some fascinating people with underdeveloped potential or pressing personal problems on their journey.  And this is where the program runs off the rails.  At the end of the show the CEO revels himself and provides feedback to those he’s worked with.  Fair enough.  But then he starts giving away perks.

Waitresses become marketing managers, truck drivers get their own store franchise, and overworked employees get sent on exotic fully paid vacations.

That’s all well and good for the folks involved.  Most of them seem like they are deserving.  But the chances that the CEO randomly encountered just the rare few deserving employees in his company is negligible.  These are a few of among thousands of hard working deserving folks working for them.  But these few are getting rewarded, and their colleagues are not.

In reality, they are simply being rewarded because they are met the CEO and made an impression.  If the CEO actually met every one of his employees and gave them an opportunity to make a similar impression, would he reward all of them?  I doubt it.  It simply wouldn’t be practical, much less a financially sound decision.

So in the end, while these folks are not undeserving, they are being rewarded simply because they made a connection with the big boss.  The program, which purports to bust the executive stereotype of a detached and uncaring tyrant, winds up bolstering a different stereotype, that getting ahead is all about who you know.

Maybe it’s entertaining, but it’s not good business, and it’s not terribly encouraging to the average worker.

The Perfect Man

February 21st, 2010

George ClooneyKim doesn’t know it, at least consciously, but she prefers me to George Clooney and Toby Keith.  Oh sure, I know I’m not as smooth and good looking as George, and while Toby makes her swoon when he sings, I make her ears bleed.  But apparently none of that matters.

Toby KeithI know this because a poll of 2,500 women revealed that 91 per cent would actually prefer a guy who had a few flaws.  A spokesman for www.onepoll.com, which carried out the research, said: “Publically, girls will claim they want a muscly guy, who is hair free and manly enough not to show his emotional side.”  But their secret desires explain why the rest of us get dates from time to time anyway.

As a service to Kim, I’ve listed the most sought after qualities in a man and compared myself against my celebrity competition.  In fact, if rooting for my sons’ school teams counts as being passionate about a sports team then I’m a clean sweep.  She so wants me. Although I’m sure she wouldn’t mind if I could sing to boot.

Kim's Perfect Man

Sharktopus!

February 20th, 2010

Shark vs. OctopusI know many of you were left hanging at the conclusion of Mega Shark vs. Giant Octopus.  Would Debbie Gibson’s new love last?  And more importantly, did the plane eating shark and the submarine wielding octopus really destroy each other at the end?

Well SyFy has another installment to settle this issue.  Apparently Ms. Gibson wasn’t the only one smitten in the first movie.

Syfy’s original movies director Karen O’Hara tweeted recently that B-Movie God Roger Corman will be producing SHARKTOPUS!  Yes folks, the illicit and unlikely love child of two improbable prehistoric creatures will wreak its own havoc from the deep.

No word on who the human actors will be, but you can bet they’ll have limited skill.  And SyFy’s special effects department works on a tight budget, so we’ll be treated to delightfully hokey CGI.

Let the popcorn pop and the couch potato heckling begin.  This is gonna be epic…

Frickin’ Rocket Surgeons

February 19th, 2010

I’d like to make this a rant.  Usually the disingenuous, manipulative, untruths spouted by Conservative mouthpieces really gets my back up.  But sometimes the tide is overwhelming and the stench on the beach is self-evident.  These geniuses give true conservatives a bad reputation.  Judge for yourself.

First up is Michele Bachmann, the reality impaired Representative from Minnesota.  (Seriously guys, Jesse “The Body” Ventura was a better choice for public office.)  Ms. Bachmann was stumping recently for the North Dakota Republican party.  During a keynote address at their convention she lambasted Obama for racking up more dept than all the other Presidents combined.  She was pining for the days of George Bush who only racked up $400B in debt according to her version of the facts.  She then went on to explain that Obama was going to raise your taxes 40% this year.  All easily disputed facts, and not even directionally correct.  But they resonated with her audience.

Next up is Fox & Friends.  Tucker Carlson comes on to assert that college makes you liberal and teaches you nothing about civics.  He sites stats about how college graduates are more liberal and somehow makes the leap that this is due to indoctrination by liberal professors.  They are clearly brainwashing students because uncomfortable portions of graduates don’t know basic civics facts.  Never mind that even larger percentages of non graduates flunk these questions.  Finally, when asked point-blank if college is worth it, he says the jury is still out, but accedes there may be some value.


And finally comes Tracy Klugian, a Teabagger from Elyria, Ohio.  Tracy finally Googled the term “teabag”, and is suddenly embarrassed.  Apparently he’d been wondering what all the tittering was about.  But he’s putting his new-found knowledge into action by urging Tea Party leaders to consider changing the name to… “Donkey Punchers.”   Yup, that should do it.  No one will make fun of that name.

Olympic Update

February 18th, 2010

I confessed to Kim the other day that Ice skating is one of my least favorite sports covered during the Olympics.  Unfortunately, its popularity with the rest of you means it gets disproportionately aired during prime time.  I don’t think it’s the lack of imminent danger that accompanies sports I enjoy like Luge and Snowboard Cross, because I find Curling to be oddly compelling.  However, that may be because it’s the only Olympic Sport I’m in any sort of physical shape to compete in.  If I only had skills.  On the other hand, maybe I was just scared off skating by those creepy clown costumes worn by the German couple a few nights back.

I’m also having mixed feelings about skiing now because of Australian Dale Begg-Smith who won silver in the Men’s Moguls.  It turns out he’s had time to hone his sport because he’s gotten quite wealthy from a company that an Austrailian newspaper described as , “the origin of spyware programs that can redirect a computer to porn sites or install software that floods the computer with pop-up ads.”  He is often referred to as The Spam King.  I suppose your day job shouldn’t matter, but I’d rather see this guy as a bobsled hood ornament than on the medal stand.

Bobsled GeekAnd speaking of bobsleds, kudos to Steven Holcomb, an all American geek on the U.S.A. bobsled team.  He’s currently working on his Computer Science degree, is A+ certified, and openly touts his love of gaming and gadgets.

When asked if his teammates teased him about his geeky ways he said, “They did at first, but then they realized that I’m the only one that can fix their computers.”

That’s my boy!  And maybe the reason bobsled is my favorite Olympic sport of the moment.  Then again, biathlon is pretty exciting.  Or at least it would be if they just changed a couple of rules so it played out more like the video below.

Barbie’s a Geek!!

February 17th, 2010

Geek BarbieMattel asked their fans what Barbie’s 125th career should be.  The public voted, and the results are more than a little suspect.  Barbie has become a Computer Engineer. Woot!

Ummm… cool, in a way, but surprising in a nation whose students are shunning high tech careers and whose populace prefer their scientists as action heroes. (I’m looking at  you Indiana Jones.)  It does seem though that nerds are somewhat responsible. Reddit (a programming playground) ran a Vote for Barbie campaign. So Mattel may have been pwned a bit here. If true, it would be more than a little satisfying that Barbie, the prototypical stacked blonde that most geeks couldn’t attain in their wildest virtual world fantasies, was duped unwittingly into the Land of the Nerds by nerds doing what nerds do best.

Trust me, Barbie has no idea what she’s in for.  But at least she’s going in armed with a pink laptop.

History of the World – Part Deux

February 16th, 2010

As a service to my high school age readers, this video is pretty much AP World History boiled down to 3:12.  Any questions?  (Note: as a special treat for my son Doug, there is a disproportionate focus on things that go “BOOM”!)

What’s In a Name?

February 15th, 2010

It turns out that what you call something makes a bigger difference than you might hope.  A new New York Times/CBS News poll asked if Gays and Lesbians should be allowed to serve openly in the military.  6 in 10 were in favor.  In theory this should bode well for repealing the Don’t Ask, Don’t Tell policy.

But wait… the organization then re-ran the poll with the same demographic and asked if homosexuals should be allowed to serve openly.  This time, only 4 in 10 were in favor.   Presumably this means that somewhere around a fifth of Americans are thinking they’re okay with Gays and Lesbians, as long as they’re not the homosexual kind.

…And isn’t it just like the damned homosexual Gays to go and ruin it for all the other ones?

Give a Valentine to a Nation

February 14th, 2010

Invade a Hospital

Is it really about ideology?  Or is it just about priorities?  Maybe it’s all well intentioned but misguided fear.  Regardless.  It’s wrong.